Review: ‘Nun II’ is a horror film in need of a good startling

[ad_1]

Taissa Farmiga as Sister Irene in New Line Cinema’s horror thriller “The Nun II.”

By Mark Kennedy | Associated Press

“The Conjuring” Universe celebrates 10 years in business this fall with the dull “The Nun II,” a movie that seems destined to pound a nail into this franchise’s undead coffin.

A new directing and writing team fails to shock or scare with a color-by-numbers plot and a meandering, languid wannabe frightfest. A few audience members fired up their phones halfway through a recent preview, a bad sign for anyone hoping for a gripping experience.

A sequel to “The Nun” — the top-earning film in the franchise, with more than $366 million worldwide — was never going to be denied and the sequel hews carefully to the previous success. You could even say it’s haunted by its better precedent.

This time it is 1956 — four years after the events of “The Nun” — and a demon is once again stalking Europe. It’s the same horrific Valak we met last time and suspected didn’t die, despite being splashed by the blood of Christ. “The demon lives,” we are told.

Returning are Taissa Farmiga — younger sister of “The Conjuring” star Vera Farmiga — as wide-eyed Sister Irene, and Jonas Bloquet as Maurice, the French-Canadian hero dripping with charm. The filmmakers attempt to give us more backstory for Sister Irene — mostly flashbacks to her mom — but it doesn’t add much.

New this time is Storm Reid as a skeptical novice who smokes and doesn’t really buy the water-into-wine story. She is well introduced and seems a good foil to Sister Irene’s devoted nun but is soon abandoned and never has her come-to-Jesus moment.

[ad_2]

Source link