Net benefits to Canada went unquestioned in big forestry buyouts – Business News

[ad_1]

Stefan Labbé, Glacier Media – | Story: 429950

Earlier this year, Paper Excellence capped off an unprecedented series of multibillion-dollar buyouts to become the largest forestry company in Canada.

Members of Parliament investigating the company’s business ties and corporate structure learned Friday that Industry Canada did not conduct a net benefit analysis to see if company’s recent US$3-billion purchase of Domtar and US$2.7-billion buyout of Resolute Forest Products were in the economic interests of Canadians.

NDP natural resource critic Charlie Angus said he was “absolutely gobsmacked.”

“How is it possible the government could say that there wasn’t an obligation to question the net benefit to Canada?” said Angus.

“I certainly can’t see there’s any benefit in turning over our forests, our environment to a company that’s a series of shell companies, and they refuse to tell us who owns it.”

The federal probe follows the release of a journalistic investigation by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) that found a series of links — including leaked emails, corporate documentation, shipping records and interviews with former employees — connecting Paper Excellence, ostensibly owned by Jackson Wijaya, and APP, headed by Wijaya’s father.

The committee motion to investigate Paper Excellence, passed in March, called on Wijaya and Minister of Innovation, Science and Economic Development Francois-Phillipe Champagne to answer questions. Neither Wijaya nor Champagne have appeared before the committee.

On Friday, officials from Champagne’s ministry told MPs net benefit reviews of foreign acquisitions only occur in cases where they meet certain guidelines — including whether they are linked to military supply chains, espionage, critical minerals, sensitive technology, or are near a sensitive site or military base.

Paper Excellence — a foreign-owned company, controlled through a number of shell companies — does not meet that bar because its acquisitions dealt in the purchase of pulp and paper infrastructure and logging concessions now totalling more than 22 million hectares (roughly seven times bigger than Vancouver Island).

“I want to know if anybody representing the Canadian government thought there were red flags when turning over such a massive amount of forest,” said Angus.

“Because if they didn’t think any of that mattered, then God help Canada.”

Bloc Québécois MP Mario Simard questioned senior department officials whether its national security review of the deals revealed Paper Excellence was ultimately controlled by Asia Pulp and Paper (APP).

“The link that we’re trying to see is the link between Mr. Wijaya and another firm,” Simard said through an interpreter.

“My question is quite simple: do you have the result of an analysis, which yes or no… does establish a link between Mr. Wijaya and Asia Pulp and Paper?”

Mark Schaan, the department’s senior assistant deputy minister of strategy and innovation policy sector, said Jackson Wijaya was found to be the beneficial owner of Paper Excellence. Schaan declined to comment on any links it found between Paper Excellence and APP, citing confidentiality agreements under the Investment Canada Act.

A day before the meeting, Glacier Media and other ICIJ media partners reported on a 2017 briefing note provided to the Nova Scotia government affirming Paper Excellence was ultimately controlled by APP.

On Tuesday, a Paper Excellence executive told MPs ties had been cut with APP in 2015, two years earlier.

Dan Albas, Conservative MP for B.C.’s Central Okanagan-Similkameen-Nicola riding, asked Schaan to provide any documentation that would refute the links drawn in the Nova Scotia government briefing note. The department official once again said the confidentiality agreement prevented him from doing so.

Angus later put the committee on notice. In addition to summoning Wijaya, he would request ministerial briefing notes and documentation related to national security reviews conducted in Paper Excellence’s acquisitions of Domtar and Resolute.

Earlier this week, Conservative MP and natural resources critic Shannon Stubbs said she would back Angus’s motion to summon Wijaya, and would submit her own motion to summon Minister Champagne to answer questions before the committee.

Since the investigation was announced, Angus said Paper Excellence lobbyists had put “heavy pressure” on a number of MPs with mills in their ridings. He said he was concerned “scaring local communities” would get in the way of the committee’s obligation to carry out due diligence.

“This is not a witch hunt. This is about giving Canadians accountability and answers,” Angus said.

“My message to Mr. Wijaya is ‘you got a good story to tell? Then come and tell it,’ because what was done behind the scenes under the protection of the confidentiality agreements doesn’t cut it.”

They investigation is scheduled to continue June 6.

the Starliner capsule was on track for a July test flight with two astronauts to the International Space Station, a planned trip that was already well behind schedule.

But final reviews uncovered issues with the parachute lines and other problems that were present on last year’s test flight with no one on board and, officials said, should have been caught years ago.

As for whether Starliner might fly by year’s end, Boeing program manager Mark Nappi said, “I think it’s feasible, but I certainly don’t want to commit to any dates or time frames” until the problems are fixed.

The capsule is full of wire harnesses wrapped in white tape that’s flammable, according to Nappi. Rather than trying to remove the hundreds of feet of tape, which was supposed to protect against scuffing, the company may cover it with a safer material.

The parachute lines also were not designed to be strong enough to meet safety standards.

“These tests were run many years ago. We reviewed those results. We missed those results, and this could have been caught sooner,” Nappi said.

Following the retirement of the space shuttles more than a decade ago, NASA hired Boeing and SpaceX to transport astronauts to and from the space station. SpaceX has now completed 10 crew flights, three of them private. Boeing had to repeat its 2019 test flight without a crew because of software and other issues.

“NASA desperately needs a second provider for crew transportation,” said Steve Stich, the space agency’s commercial crew program manager.

The goal is to have one SpaceX and one Boeing taxi flight to the station each year.

Airbnb settled a lawsuit against the city over monthly reporting requirements for its listings. Airbnb said the 2022 ordinance violates both settlements.

The New York restrictions are among many efforts by local communities to regulate short-term rentals without banning them. New Orleans is among cities taking on the rental giant, after a court struck down a previous law.

In some places, opponents have raised concerns about noise and safety. Critics also say the growth of short-term rentals pioneered by Airbnb has contributed to a shortage of affordable housing for residents, particularly in vacation towns. Those complaints extend far beyond U.S. borders.

On Thursday in Italy, the popular tourist destination of Florence announced an immediate ban on new vacation rentals in the city’s historic center.

tensions with parent company Restaurant Brands International Inc. QSR-T

In a letter sent to fellow franchisees in April, which was obtained by The Globe and Mail, Jeri Horton-Joyce announced her retirement effective May 31. She owned three Tim Hortons locations in Cobourg, Ont., and one in nearby Colborne, Ont.

In a statement, Tim Hortons president Axel Schwan confirmed that Ms. Horton-Joyce had transferred her restaurants to a family member, “and in addition to other extended family members who are current franchisees, this means that these important family legacies with the Tim Hortons brand will continue.”

Recently, Ms. Horton-Joyce was part of the board of directors of the Alliance of Canadian Franchisees (ACF), an independent group representing some disgruntled Tim Hortons franchisees. The ACF board resigned in March after Restaurant Brands International (RBI) sent default notices to the Tim Hortons owners serving on the board. RBI also terminated the franchise contract of its president, Ron Fox, at the time.

The board members had only been in their roles for a short time after the ACF appointed a new executive director the previous fall. The group had raised concerns in February about falling profits at Tim Hortons, a problem the parent company’s executives have said is a priority to address.

Ms. Horton-Joyce did not attribute her retirement decision to the recent tensions, writing only that the move came “sooner than I anticipated but for a variety of reasons it is the right time,” according to the letter. “I will still have family involved in the business and I want them to continue to prosper.”

Ms. Horton-Joyce declined a request for comment. ACF executive director Dave Lush also declined to comment.

“I am asking that everyone continue to help keep this fantastic brand going and to make it what we know it can be,” Ms. Horton-Joyce wrote in the letter. “Keep demanding better, never give up.”

Sales across the Tim Hortons chain have been going up, but cost pressures have squeezed restaurant owners’ profits. In February, Restaurant Brands disclosed that the average Tim Hortons location made $220,000 in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA) in 2022 – down from $320,000 in 2018 when the company last reported those numbers. It has committed to reporting profit numbers annually in the future.

Last month, RBI chief executive Joshua Kobza said that franchisee profitability improved in its first quarter, though the company also acknowledged that it has continued to pass on rising commodity prices to franchisees. On a call to discuss first-quarter earnings, RBI executive chair Patrick Doyle said franchisee profitability is being given greater weight in incentive compensation for employees. But Mr. Doyle also reiterated a message that a “small number” of franchisees who were not “all in” on the company’s plans will be leaving the system.

Despite the tensions, Restaurant Brands says the vast majority of restaurant owners whose franchise agreements have come up for renewal in recent months have remained with the business. Since January, RBI has granted 215 new restaurant agreements to existing franchisees, and declined five owners who wanted to renew, according to the company.

Ms. Horton-Joyce’s decision was preceded by her husband and co-owner, Ron Joyce Jr. – son of the chain’s co-founder and first franchisee – who previously retired from the business.

“The Horton and Joyce families have contributed so much to Canada’s culture and fabric over the last 60 years. Jeri and Ron have all my best wishes for their retirement,” Mr. Schwan wrote in his statement.

Ms. Horton-Joyce’s brief tenure on the board of the breakaway franchisee group was not her first time in the spotlight. In 2018, she and Mr. Joyce drew widespread criticism after they cut back on paid breaks and reduced employee benefits at two locations in Cobourg. A memo from the owners claimed the changes were necessary because of the increase in Ontario’s minimum wage that year.

Ms. Horton-Joyce spent 37 years with the company as a franchise owner and operations representative. In her letter, she wrote about her memories of her father bringing home product recipes and coffee blends, turning to his family as a “test market,” although she added that the children were not permitted to drink the coffee “until our feet could touch the floor.”

“Hang in there,” she wrote. “Better times hopefully will return soon.”

hundreds of bills that passed in the state Senate and Assembly this week before Friday — the last day a bill can pass out of its original chamber and get a chance to become law later this year.

The bill, which passed the Assembly floor with bipartisan support, would require companies such as Google and Meta to share with California media companies their advertising revenue stemming from the news and other reported content. The amount would be determined through an arbitration process. The bill would also require at least 70% of the shared revenue go toward journalists’ salaries.

Such payments would help local media organizations survive after many have seen their advertising revenues nosedive in the digital era, said the bill’s author, Democratic Assemblymember Buffy Wicks. California has lost more than 100 news organizations in the past decade, she said.

“The California Journalism Preservation Act will not save journalism, but it will provide a support for news outlets and journalists at a moment when the stakes could not be higher,” Wicks said Thursday.

The bill is backed by major journalism unions such as the News Media Alliance and Media Guild of the West, which represents The Los Angeles Times and other newsrooms. The California Labor Federation joined in supporting the bill Thursday, saying the bill would protect journalism jobs by “leveling the playing field between publishers and social media websites.”

Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram, threatened to pull all news content from its platforms if the bill becomes law. The company has made similar threats to the U.S. Congress in 2022 and the Canadian government this year when those lawmakers attempted similar measures to bolster local journalism.

Meta also said the California bill would create a “slush fund” primarily benefiting out-of-state newspaper chains and hedge funds.

“The bill fails to recognize that publishers and broadcasters put their content on our platform themselves and that substantial consolidation in California’s local news industry came over 15 years ago, well before Facebook was widely used,” a Meta spokesperson said in a statement a day ahead of the vote. “It is disappointing that California lawmakers appear to be prioritizing the best interests of national and international media companies over their own constituents.”

Wicks called Meta’s statement “an empty threat,” noting that “these are companies that have made billions and billions and billions of dollars while our newsrooms are shutting down across the state of California.”

Google didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Opponents of the bill, including LION Publishers, a national news group representing more than 450 independent newsrooms, have also raised concerns that the measure would encourage more clickbait news content. An analysis of bill, conducted by the Legislature, says news organizations would more likely invest in high-quality and investigative journalism if they are financially healthy. The analysis also said concerns the bill would potentially violate the First Amendment are “mostly overstated.”

Republican Assembly member Bill Essayli, who co-authored the bill, said it doesn’t impose a tax on Big Tech.

“I do not support corporate welfare, … but I also do not support unjust enrichment,” Essayli said Thursday. “If you’re taking other people’s work product and you’re financially benefiting from it, you must compensate them for it.”

Democratic Assembly member Al Muratsuchi urged Wicks to continue working with local news organizations to make sure small and ethnic-owned newsrooms are not left behind. Wicks said she’s committed to resolve that concern.

“I know that this is still a work in progress, but what I also know is that doing nothing is not an option,” Wicks said.

The bill now heads to the state Senate.

More Business News

[ad_2]

Source link