In a regulatory filing released today (21 August), 888 announced Shay Segev, who was Alexander’s successor at GVC prior to the business’ rebrand to Entain, saw his agreement to provide voting rights to FS Gaming terminated.

Under the initial deal signed between the two, Segev had granted the voting rights attached his 9,063,313 ordinary shares of GBP£0.005 each, or 2.02% of 888’s overall share capital, to FS Gaming.

The news comes in the wake of FS Gaming’s failed takeover bid of 888. Under the group’s proposal, former GVC chairman Lee Feldman would reprise the same role at the London-listed operator, while Alexander and former GCV director Stephen Morana would take over as CEO and CFO respectively.  

The proposal also would’ve seen FS Gaming’s total stake in 888 increase beyond the 10% threshold which would’ve triggered a change of corporate control requiring approval from the Gambling Commission.

However, the Commission raised concerns related to an ongoing HRMC investigation into GVC’s historic Turkish operations and alleged misconduct by employees and third-party suppliers.

Due to these concerns, the HRMC probe prompted the Commission to launch a review of 888’s licence. According to the regulator, it did so after FS Gaming failed to sufficiently address its questions on past conduct.

The operator said due to the licence review and the business’ own due diligence, the board unanimously agreed to terminate discussions with FS Gaming. It did so after concluding the takeover bid would put the company’s GB licences “at immediate and significant risk”.

Entain puts £585m aside after DPA negotiations

This month, Entain announced it had put £585m aside following its entrance into a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) with the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).

The business said its DPA negotiations are at a point where it had the confidence to calculate the settlement amount, which it expects to pay over a four year period.

However, Entain emphasised the resolution provides legal cover to just the company. This suggests former GVC executives may still face legal liability for the business’ historic activities in Turkey.