A global analysis of coral reef conservation preferences – Nature Sustainability

[ad_1]

  • Vince, G. Reef grief. Nat. Clim. Change 1, 339–340 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Souter, D. et al. The Sixth Status of Corals of the World: 2020 Report (GCRMN, 2020).

  • van Hooidonk, R. et al. Local-scale projections of coral reef futures and implications of the Paris Agreement. Sci. Rep. 6, 39666 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Strona, G. et al. Global tropical reef fish richness could decline by around half if corals are lost. Proc. R. Soc. B https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2021.0274 (2021).

  • Mora, C. et al. Global human footprint on the linkage between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in reef fishes. PLoS Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1000606 (2011).

  • Strona, G. et al. Ecological dependencies make remote reef fish communities most vulnerable to coral loss. Nat. Commun. 12, 7282 (2021).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • McGowan, J., Possingham, H. & Anthony, K. Don’t let climate crush coral efforts. Nature 536, 396 (2016).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nunes, P. A. & van den Bergh, J. C. Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense or nonsense? Ecol. Econ. 39, 203–222 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Nobel, A. et al. Are biodiversity losses valued differently when they are caused by human activities? A meta-analysis of the non-use valuation literature. Environ. Res. Lett. 15, 073003 (2020).

  • Hanemann, W. M. Valuing the environment through contingent valuation. J. Econ. Perspect. 8, 19–43 (1994).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cinner, J. E. et al. Building adaptive capacity to climate change in tropical coastal communities. Nat. Clim. Change 8, 117–123 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ferraro, P. J. & Simpson, R. D. The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Econ. 78, 339–353 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • UNEP-WCMC, WorldFish Centre, WRI & TNC Global Distribution of Warm-Water Coral Reefs, Compiled from Multiple Sources Including the Millennium Coral Reef Mapping Project Version 4.1 (UN Environment World Conservation Monitoring Centre, 2021); https://data.unep-wcmc.org/datasets/1

  • Spalding, M. et al. Mapping the global value and distribution of coral reef tourism. Mar. Policy 82, 104–113 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hicks, C. C. How do we value our reefs? Risks and tradeoffs across scales in ‘biomass based’ economies. Coast. Manage. 39, 358–376 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cesar, H., Burke, L. & Pet-Soede, L. The Economics of Worldwide Coral Reef Degradation (Cesar Environmental Economics Consulting, 2003).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Spurgeon, J. The socio-economic costs and benefits of coastal habitat rehabilitation and creation. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 37, 373–382 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. Scarcity: Why Having Too Little Means So Much (Macmillan, 2013).

  • Shah, A. K., Shafir, E. & Mullainathan, S. Scarcity frames value. Psychol. Sci. 26, 402–412 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rolfe, J. & Windle, J. Testing benefit transfer of reef protection values between local case studies: the Great Barrier Reef in Australia. Ecol. Econ. 81, 60–69 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hanley, N., Schläpfer, F. & Spurgeon, J. Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance–decay functions for use and non-use values. J. Environ. Manage. 68, 297–304 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Marshall, N. A., Marshall, P. A., Abdulla, A. & Rouphael, T. The links between resource dependency and attitude of commercial fishers to coral reef conservation in the Red Sea. Ambio 39, 305–313 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cinner, J. E. Coral reef livelihoods. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 7, 65–71 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hughes, S. et al. A framework to assess national level vulnerability from the perspective of food security: the case of coral reef fisheries. Environ. Sci. Policy 23, 95–108 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ngoc, Q. T. K. Assessing the value of coral reefs in the face of climate change: the evidence from Nha Trang Bay, Vietnam. Ecosyst. Serv. 35, 99–108 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Darling, E. S. & D’agata, S. Coral reefs: fishing for sustainability. Curr. Biol. 27, 65–68 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pascal, N. et al. Economic valuation of coral reef ecosystem service of coastal protection: a pragmatic approach. Ecosyst. Serv. 21, 72–80 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Caldeira, K. Coral ‘refugia’ amid heating seas. Nat. Clim. Change 3, 444–445 (2013).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Shah, A. K., Mullainathan, S. & Shafir, E. Some consequences of having too little. Science 338, 682–685 (2012).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Riegl, B. M. & Dodge, R. E. Coral Reefs of the USA (Springer, 2008).

  • Foale, S. J. Conserving Melanesia’s coral reef heritage in the face of climate change. Hist. Environ. 21, 30–36 (2008).

  • Robinson, P. J. et al. Understanding the determinants of biodiversity non-use values in the context of climate change: stated preferences for the Hawaiian coral reefs. Ecosyst. Serv. 53, 101393 (2022).

  • Corruption Perceptions Index 2022 (Transparency International, 2023); https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2022

  • Edwards, A. J. & Clark, S. Coral transplantation: a useful management tool or misguided meddling. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 37, 474–487 (1999).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rinkevich, B. in Coral Reef Restoration Handbook (ed. Precht, W. F.) Ch. 16 (CRC Press, 2006).

  • Bongiorni, L. et al. First step in the restoration of a highly degraded coral reef (Singapore) by in situ coral intensive farming. Aquaculture 322, 191–200 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M. & Charles, S. T. Taking time seriously: a theory of socioemotional selectivity. Am. Psychol. 54, 165–181 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boonmanunt, S., Lauer, T., Rockenbach, B. & Weiss, A. Field evidence on the role of time preferences in conservation behavior. J. Environ. Econ. Manage. 104, 102368 (2020).

  • Fehr, E. & Leibbrandt, A. A field study on cooperativeness and impatience in the tragedy of the commons. J. Public Econ. 95, 1144–1155 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn. Psychol. 5, 207–232 (1973).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022); https://www.cbd.int/doc/decisions/cop-15/cop-15-dec-04-en.pdf

  • Nielsen, K. S. et al. Biodiversity conservation as a promising frontier for behavioural science. Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 550–556 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fisher, B., Marteau, T. & Balmford, A. Use nudges to change behaviour towards conservation. Nature 569, 630–631 (2019).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Balmford, A. et al. Making more effective use of human behavioural science in conservation interventions. Biol. Conserv. 261, 109256 (2021).

  • Whitehead, J. C., Pattanayak, S. K., van Houtven, G. L. & Gelso, B. R. Combining revealed and stated preference data to estimate the nonmarket value of ecological services: an assessment of the state of the science. J. Econ. Surv. 22, 872–908 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Arrow, K. et al. Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. Fed. Regist. 58, 4601–4614 (1993).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M. & Greene, W. H. Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2005).

  • Speers, A. E., Besedin, E. Y., Palardy, J. E. & Moore, C. Impacts of climate change and ocean acidification on coral reef fisheries: an integrated ecological–economic model. Ecol. Econ. 128, 33–43 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, P. Y., Chen, C. C., Chu, L. & McCarl, B. Evaluating the economic damage of climate change on global coral reefs. Glob. Environ. Change 30, 12–20 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ryffel, A. N., Rid, W. & Grêt-Regamey, A. Land use trade-offs for flood protection: a choice experiment with visualizations. Ecosyst. Serv. 10, 111–123 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Williams, B. K. & Johnson, F. A. Confronting dynamics and uncertainty in optimal decision making for conservation. Environ. Res. Lett. 8, 025004 (2013).

  • McCarthy, M. A. Contending with uncertainty in conservation management decisions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1322, 77–91 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rose, J. M., Bliemer, M. C., Hensher, D. A. & Collins, A. T. Designing efficient stated choice experiments in the presence of reference alternatives. Transp. Res. Part B 42, 395–406 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • GDP per Capita, PPP (Current International $) (World Bank, 2022); https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.CD

  • [ad_2]

    Source link